Applied AI for work that has to survive an audit.

Loan files, KYC packets, and transaction exceptions get reviewed by hand because the output has to be defensible. We engineer AI that extracts, classifies, and flags, with the citation, the confidence score, and the human sign-off attached to every decision.

loan_docs.classifyIllustrative
  1. 1docs.ingestdoc store142 pages, 6 document types
  2. 2entities.extractdoc storeborrower, collateral, covenants
  3. 3anomaly.flagloan file2 mismatches against the file
  4. 4report.buildloan fileaudit-ready summary attached

4 calls · 142 pages · 2 flags raised

The work today

Where the hours go.

In a regulated shop the constraint is never enthusiasm for automation. It’s whether the output can be defended. That changes what you build.

  • The same document, ten thousand times

    Loan files, statements, KYC packets. Analysts read the same handful of document types all year, and the reason a person does it is defensibility, not difficulty.

  • Exceptions eat the week

    Straight-through cases already clear themselves. Your team spends its week on the few that don’t, chasing missing pages and reconciling figures that refuse to tie.

  • A black box is unusable

    Model risk management and your examiners want to know how a decision was reached. A system that’s right 95% of the time is worth nothing if it can’t show the work.

  • The core has no API

    The system of record is a mainframe or a vendor platform with a nightly batch file. Anything real-time has to be engineered around it, and most vendors quietly assume it away.

Workflows

Where AI now changes the economics.

Every run leaves a trail: which page a number came from, how confident the system is, and who signed off. That’s what makes it usable in a regulated shop.

  • Loan document review

    Ingests the file, extracts borrower, collateral, and covenant terms, and flags anything that doesn’t tie to the application. Audit-ready summary attached to the loan record.

    Doc store → extraction → origination system

  • KYC and onboarding packets

    Assembles the packet, verifies each document against the requirement list, and returns a single exception list instead of five separate email threads.

    Intake → verification APIs → CRM

  • Transaction exception handling

    Works the break queue: pulls both sides of the record, proposes the reconciliation with its reasoning, and escalates only what a person genuinely has to judge.

    Core → ledger → exception queue

  • Regulatory report drafting

    Pulls the period figures, drafts the narrative sections, and cites the source system and timestamp behind every number in the filing.

    Warehouse → reporting layer → filing draft

  • Client servicing requests

    Reads the inbound request, retrieves account context under the requester’s own permissions, completes the change, and logs it. Handoff to a person is clean when it happens.

    Email or portal → core → CRM

The frontier, applied

What’s newly possible here. And what each one changes in financial services.

  • Multimodal AI

    Statements, tax returns, and scanned packets read and structured, every figure traced to its page.

    Documents, images, and forms become structured data without anyone keying them in.

  • Reasoning systems

    Underwriting and policy rules applied case by case, with the reasoning shown for model risk review.

    Models work through policy, rules, and edge cases, and show how they reached the answer.

  • Agentic workflows

    The exception queue worked end to end; analysts approve the proposals instead of building them.

    Multi-step processes run end to end. People approve the exceptions instead of doing every step.

  • MCP & agent interoperability

    Scoped, auditable access to the core and CRM under the permissions you already manage.

    Your software gains a second kind of user: agents, with scoped and auditable access to act.

How we work

From the first workflow to production. Governed the whole way.

Your risk team sets the thresholds and your tenant holds the data. The people who scope it are the people who ship it.

  1. 01Advise

    Instrument the queue

    We shadow the analysts and measure volume by document type, exception rate, time per file, and where rework originates. Workflows come back ranked by defensibility, not only by hours saved.

  2. 02Engineer

    Through the core you actually have

    APIs where they exist, batch files and message queues where they don’t, deployed in your own tenant. Your loan files, policy manuals, and guidance become the layer every answer traces back to.

  3. 03Operate

    Drift shows up as a number

    Extraction accuracy tracked against a labelled set, cost per file, and exception rate over time, with an engineer who owns the system after launch.

GovernEvidence before anyone asksConfidence thresholds set with your risk team, anything below the line routed to a named reviewer, and full run logs exportable. When examiners ask how it works, the report already exists.Across all three

Systems

Inside the systems you already run, not beside them.

  • Core banking and lending platforms
  • Loan origination and servicing systems
  • Document imaging and content stores
  • Mainframe batch and message queues
  • Snowflake and Databricks
  • Your Azure or AWS tenant

Proof

The closest work we can show. Related work, stated plainly.

All case studies

Bring us your slowest review.

The queue your analysts dread: loan files, exceptions, KYC. An AI engineer will tell you what today’s AI can take, what evidence it produces for your examiners, and where people stay in the loop.